Jullianna name report
Official spelling unranked - combined spellings #152 - trajectory through 2025: declining
Grouped with spelling variants, it behaves like #152 instead of unranked. Usage is now 54.7% of its peak level.
How common it feels
In a randomly mixed group of children born in 2025, this is the practical scale of Jullianna after using the combined spelling group.
| Class (25) | Grade (100) | School (300) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expected with this name | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.18 |
| Chance of a duplicate | 1.4% | 5.7% | 16.4% |
U.S. popularity over time
National history only. Use the controls to compare exact spelling with grouped spellings.
Jullianna officially ranks unranked in 2025; grouped spellings rank #152. Usage is now 54.7% of its peak level.
Spelling reality check
SSA rankings treat every spelling separately. This section shows how the name changes when common variants are grouped.
| Spelling | Count | Share | Official rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Juliana | 1,203 | 60.7% | #256 |
| Julianna | 779 | 39.3% | #398 |
National spelling composition over time
Grouped by variant map v0.1 (compact_strict). Official SSA data treats each spelling separately.
How is this calculated?
Official rank uses only the exact spelling. Combined rank groups common spellings and recomputes ranks after summing counts. All ranks are sex-specific.
Where it stands out right now
State context is a latest-year snapshot. Darker teal means this name is more common than nationally; tan means less common.
Show exact state values
| State | State rank | Rate per 10k | vs national |
|---|---|---|---|
| NJ | #79 | 26.2 | 2.1× as common as nationally |
| CT | #104 | 24.3 | 2.0× as common as nationally |
| CA | #92 | 20.8 | 1.7× as common as nationally |
| NV | #134 | 19.6 | 1.6× as common as nationally |
| MA | #117 | 19.1 | 1.6× as common as nationally |
| KS | #154 | 18.6 | 1.5× as common as nationally |
| NY | #120 | 17.4 | 1.4× as common as nationally |
| PA | #134 | 17.3 | 1.4× as common as nationally |
| IL | #127 | 17.1 | 1.4× as common as nationally |
| TX | #114 | 16.9 | 1.4× as common as nationally |
| AZ | #139 | 16.7 | 1.4× as common as nationally |
| FL | #134 | 16.3 | 1.3× as common as nationally |
| CO | #166 | 15.4 | 1.3× as common as nationally |
| MD | #178 | 15.0 | 1.2× as common as nationally |
| MI | #179 | 14.0 | 1.1× as common as nationally |
| IN | #186 | 14.0 | 1.1× as common as nationally |
| VA | #179 | 13.6 | 1.1× as common as nationally |
| OK | #213 | 12.9 | 1.0× as common as nationally |
| LA | #215 | 12.8 | 1.0× as common as nationally |
| AL | #197 | 12.6 | 1.0× as common as nationally |
| SC | #238 | 11.5 | 0.9× (less common than nationally) |
| OH | #222 | 11.2 | 0.9× (less common than nationally) |
| WA | #250 | 10.4 | 0.8× (less common than nationally) |
| GA | #233 | 10.2 | 0.8× (less common than nationally) |
| WI | #271 | 9.9 | 0.8× (less common than nationally) |
| TN | #252 | 9.7 | 0.8× (less common than nationally) |
| NC | #254 | 9.5 | 0.8× (less common than nationally) |
| MN | #278 | 9.3 | 0.8× (less common than nationally) |
More names to explore
Once the reality check answers the main question, these cards are for browsing adjacent names.
Names with similar popularity patterns
How similarity is calculated
Similarity is precomputed from national combined-spelling histories. The score is used to rank suggestions, but the page shows only the clearest matches.